CCSi TechNotes: Patent Number 5,526,693 Oscillating Rotor Curemeter |
| United States Patent |
5,526,693 |
| Wise |
June 18, 1996 |
Oscillating Rotor Curemeter |
| Abstract |
There is disclosed a device for testing the cure properties of a visco—elastic material sample enclosed under pressure between heated dies
and on the top only of a rotor. The rotor overlying a cured elastomer sealing and heat—sink member subjects the sample to oscillatory shear, and
the torque is measured as an indication of the viscosity of the sample.
|
| Inventors: |
Wise; Raleigh W. (Ft. Myers, FL) |
| Assignee: |
Wise—Sullivan, Inc. (Akron, OH) |
| Appl. No.: |
306174 |
| Filed: |
September 14, 1994 |
| U.S. Class: |
73/843; 73/54.39 |
| Intern'l Class: |
G01N 003/24; G01N 011/16; G01N 011/14; G01N 033/44 |
| Field of Search: |
73/866,843,54.39 |
References Cited |
U.S. Patent Documents
|
| 3387490 |
Jun., 1968 |
Wise |
73/54. |
| 3479858 |
Nov., 1969 |
Umeno et al. |
73/843. |
| 3488992 |
Jan., 1970 |
Veith et al. |
374/48. |
| 3531996 |
Oct., 1970 |
Harris et al. |
73/865. |
| 4337646 |
Jul., 1982 |
Fraleigh |
73/54. |
| 4343190 |
Oct., 1982 |
Danko et al. |
73/54. |
| 4421424 |
Dec., 1983 |
Price et al. |
374/48. |
| 4539838 |
Sep., 1985 |
Fraleigh |
73/54. |
| 4552025 |
Nov., 1985 |
Barker et al. |
73/846. |
| 4829830 |
May., 1989 |
Tosaki |
73/847. |
| 4953406 |
Sep., 1990 |
Putman |
73/843. |
| Primary Examiner: Noland,Thomas P. |
| Attorney, Agent or Firm: Nielsen,Olaf |
Claims |
| 1. In a device for determining the state of cure of a thin section
elastomer sample, such device having first and second dies, means to move one die selectively into and out of contact with the other die, a rotor
oscillatable through a shaft thereof, and means to measure and record torque in the shaft as an indication of cure, the improvement comprising
a deep recess in the first die, the rotor supported in said recess by its shaft which extends from an
underside of a head of the rotor and through the first die, and elastomeric means in said recess having an upper surface contiguous with,
and matching the contour of, the underside of the rotor head to prevent intrusion of sample materials under the head, said upper surface extending
laterally beyond the head of the rotor to form a sample support. |
|
2. The device of claim 1, wherein said upper surface has a diameter substantially greater than a diameter of the head of the rotor.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein said elastomeric means comprises a cured silicone member.
|
|
4. The device of claim 1, wherein said recess is cylindrical, and said elastomeric means substantially annular.
|
|
5. The device of claim 1, wherein said elastomeric means has a height substantially less than the depth of said recess.
|
|
6. The device of claim 1, wherein said elastomeric means forms with the second die a cavity for a sample having a thickness substantially less than a height of said elastomeric means.
|
Description |
| Background of the Invention |
|
One classification that may be made of curemeters would include devices wherein one of two heated dies is rotated or oscillated with respect to
the other, and the resulting torque of the sample measured. Among prior art patents in this group would be |
| Veith et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,488,992 (1970) |
| Uremo et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,479,858 (1969) |
| Barker et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,552,025 (1985) |
| Burnin et al U.S. Pat. No. 5,079,956 (1992) |
| Putman U.S. Pat. No. 4,953,406 (1990) |
| Danko et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,343,190 (1965) |
| Tosaki U.S. Pat. No. 4,584,812 (1986) |
| A second type of curemeters, and one to which the present invention primarily addresses itself, would include devices which utilize two dies, and additionally a third, rotor, member which is oscillated to derive the required test results. This group would include: |
| rewitt et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,438 (1985) |
| Harris et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,531,996 (1970) |
| Decker U.S. Pat. No. 3,681,980 (1972) |
| Price et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,424 (1983) |
| Turner et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,275,600 (1981) |
| Wise U.S. Pat. No. 3,387,490 (1968) |
| Beatty et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,182,494 (1965) |
| Kitchen U.S. Pat. No. 4,559,812 (1985) |
| Several common threads run through the disclosures of the above—mentioned test devices: the test sample materials are located on top of as well as
under the rotor head, i.e. the rotor head is embedded within the rubber samples during testing; and no means are provided for sealing off the
sample material from the lower die. (Additionally, in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,221,500 to Gent (1993), there is no test cavity enclosed by a pair of
dies, but rather the rotor impinges directly upon the wall of the article being cured). |
| When a test device of the above type is opened, a substantial labor and time consuming effort is required to remove the sample therefrom. In
practice, it is found necessary to employ metal bars and other tools to break the cured rubber from around the embedded rotor head, and this
effort frequently results in tearing of the sample. This then necessitates the disassembly of the rotor from the curemeter to complete the removal of
the sample, and the cleaning of any detritus which may have collected around the rotor shaft and die. When the rotor is again inserted, it is
extremely difficult to seat it at exactly its former level. Thus, while the previous series of test samples may have yielded a family of test
curves fairly closely related, when the testing continues with the rotor replaced, at even a slightly different height, a new curve—series will be
generated, slightly differently located. This will be further referred to hereinbelow. |
| The above procedures unnecessarily prolong the time the device must remain open before it is recharged with a new sample, and the result is a loss of
heat which must be recovered when the device again closes. Furthermore, without the heat sink means of the present invention to provide some
temperature control, unacceptable heat losses are also experienced from the rotor through its associated drive and support means. |
The results of these shortcomings are that the successive testing of samples shows poor reproduceability of results, with test curves, as seen hereafter, which are not closely bunched together.
|
| Summary of the Invention |
| This invention overcomes the above disadvantages by providing a curemeter having heatable die—members closeable to create a test cavity under
pressure for a rubber sample, and an oscillatable rotor between the dies. The undersurface of the rotor head and its shaft are contiguous with, and
match the contour of, the surfaces of a cured, elastomeric member, or biscuit, which functions as a heat sink and, at the same time, seals out
any intrusion by the sample beneath the rotor head hen the cavity is closed and pressurized. The only portion of the rotor head engaging the
sample is thus its top surface. |
| There is disclosed a means and method for testing an elastomeric material by providing for locating a test sample only on top of the rotor head,
like a cap thereon, rather than surrounding it top and bottom. This results in thinner—section samples more easily removable from the test
device than the prior art samples which embed the rotor head completely. |
The object of the invention is therefore to provide a test device from which test samples of thinner section are expeditiously removed from atop
the rotor, which needs to remain open for an absolutely minimum time for recharging, and which is provided with sealing and heat—maintenance means;
all to increase reproduceability of test results.
|
| Brief Description of the Drawings |
FIG. 1
is an elevational view, in cross—section, of the assembly forming a substantial portion of the curemeter of the invention, in the open position. |
Fig. 2
is an elevational view, in cross—section, similar to
FIG. 1, but with the curemeter closed. |
FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of curemeter curves, plotting time in minutes versus torque in inch—pounds, obtained from a prior art device. |
FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of curemeter curves similar to those of
FIG. 3,
but obtained from a device according to the invention. |
FIG. 5
is a partial, cross—sectional view showing a modification of the inventive device. |
When selected, Figures will appear in a separate window. This allows you to continue to read the document while the Figure is loading, lessening the time of interruption.
|
| Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment |
In
FIG. 1
and
FIG. 2
are shown an assembly suited for use in a curemeter such as described and shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,531,996 (1970) to Harris et al,
in the block diagram of
FIG. 3;
and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,438 (1985), to Prewitt et al, in
FIG. 1.
Both patents are of the second type mentioned herein before.
|
Referring specifically to
FIG. 1
and
FIG. 2,
there is shown at
10
an assembly having a circular lower metal die
12
and a circular upper metal die
14,
the dies having die—lands
13
and
15,
respectively. Between the dies is supported a metal rotor
16.
Lower die
12
is connected to lower platen
18
by threaded means
20.
Similarly, upper die
14
is connected to upper platen
22
by threaded means
24.
|
|
The dies
12
and
14
are heated by heaters
26,
well—known in the art and not further detailed here, and their temperatures controlled by well—known sensors
28.
|
|
The rotor
16,
of heat—conductive metal, comprises a head
40
having a substantially domed or cone—shaped top face
42,
here shown serrated, and an underside
44
extending at a substantial angle to the longitudinal axis of the rotor
16.
A shaft
46
extending from the underside
44
and through opening
48
in the lower die
12
is secured, as by a threaded collet
50,
to a torque shaft
52
oscillatable by drive and eccentric—means such as shown, for example, in FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 3,531,996 and in FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,438.
|
|
Lower die
12
is provided with a deep cylindrical recess
60,
which is fitted with an annular heat—sink and sealing member
62,
preferably made of cured, low modulus silicone rubber; it has a main axial height
64
which is less than the depth
66
of the recess, leaving a small cylindrical portion
68
at the top of the recess, as explained hereafter. The top surface
70
of the member
62
is substantially contiguous with, and matches the contour of, the underside
44
of the rotor head
40
which it engages.
|
|
The peak of the rotor top surface
42
is leveled with the lower die—land
13.
The top surface
70
extends laterally beyond the head
40
of the rotor, forming a small annular sample—support surface portion
72
of the member
62
which separates the rotor head from the cylindrical wall portion
68,
and also prevents metal—to—metal contact between the recess wall and the rotor head.
|
When the dies
12
and
14
are moved into closed position, a test cavity
80
(see
FIG. 2)
is created substantially between the portion
68
of the lower die
12,
the seal portion
72,
the rotor top surface
42,
and the recess
82
in the upper die
14.
The sample formed therein is seen at
84
in
FIG. 1,
and has an edge thickness
86
substantially less than the main height
64
of the seal member
62.
In a useful relationship, the seal height
64
is approximately three times the edge thickness
86.
This ensures that, as the oscillation proceeds, the rotor head will tend to flex the heat—sink/seal material, rather than slipping over its surface.
Although the seal contributes some torque to the sample measurement, a correction for this can be readily, if desired, be calculated, using the technique described by Gent and Xie [Rubber Chemistry & Technology, 66, 83 (1993)].
|
|
The volume of sample material charged into the device is usually slightly greater than the capacity of the cavity
80,
and the closing together of the dies under pressure will therefore normally result in a small amount
of the sample being squeezed out or extruded between the die—lands
13
and
15.
|
|
The top surface of portion
72
of the heat sink/sealing member
62
is lower than the level of the die—land
13
by the amount of portion
68
to ensure that seal material will not be squeezed out between the die—lands together with any excess sample material.
|
In
FIG. 3
is shown graphically a number of tests conducted according to ASTM Standard Test Method D2084—91, wherein the biconical head of a disk
rotor is completely embedded in a rubber sample. The curves generated are the typical S—curves obtained with ASTM D2084—91; since the sample totally
surrounds the biconical rotor—head, its volume and gauge are shown to cause the torque to range upwards toward 35 inch—pounds. Time is plotted
toward 12 minutes.
|
|
It will be noted that one family of curves is designated “A”. It represents a number of test—cycles, the last one of
which necessitated removal of the rotor from the curemeter in order to remove all of the cured sample. The rotor and the area of the lower die
where the rotor shaft is inserted was cleaned off, and the rotor re—inserted in the curemeter, but now it was not possible to fix its axial
location exactly as before.
|
|
Consequently, the next sample, shown by curve “B” and representing a family of test results which will obtain until the
rotor must next be removed for servicing, is seen to show an entirely new range of values. Reproduceability of test results is thus poor. Even the
curves of family “A” show, for example minimum torque values ranging over almost one—half inch—pound.
|
In
FIG. 4,
the same rubber compound as in
FIG. 3
is subjected to testing in the device of the invention, the sample here being thinner than in the
previous tests, since it is loaded into the curemeter only on the top of the rotor, and is sealed from intrusion under the head of the rotor by the
contiguous seal/heat—sink. Thus, the torque values extend only toward 25 inch—pounds. It will be noted that the family of curves “C” tracks
closely, and there are no rogue aberrations as in
FIG. 3.
Good reproduceability of test results has now been obtained. Minimum torque
values vary less than approximately one—third inch—pound.
|
FIG. 5
shows a modification wherein the rotor head
100
has a planar underside
102
contiguous with, and matching the contour of, the top planar surface
104
of the seal
106.
The laterally extending annular band portion
105
is shown canted slightly toward the bottom of the recess. |
|
Although the dies
12
and
14
are shown as circular, the recess
60
and its wall section
68
as cylindrical, and the heat sink/seal
62
and band
72
as annular, it will be understood that other shapes may be used successfully, and that other modifications may occur to those skilled in the art without
departing from the scope of the invention. |
|